![]() ![]() The majority of props are very weak in terms of appearing real or showing originality the one exception is a Jack-in-the-Box of a skull which contains a miniature of the killer in it.Īnd this script, more holes than swiss cheese! This killer would have been caught several times over by the end of the film he is a sloppy killer AND he shots someone in an occupied and no doubt video-monitored adult bookstore (which by the way happens because of an utterly badly placed sudden armed robbery). The blood coloring is off and different in every scene the splatters are utterly without the logic of physics and more than gratuitous. On top of that, it's not even thoughtful gore. It's all intentional shock and no genuine scare. I only believe there was a person on set, one Nick Palumbo, who called himself a director, but didn't actually bother directing anything other than stock body parts and corn syrup. ![]() It's written without any regard for form, story, originality, or genuine talent for horror. It's edited like someone with severe memory loss and acute ADHD did it. ![]() I don't even know where to being with my laundry list of complaints. It's not shocking, but I for one would ban or not process this film because of how absolutely poorly made it is. This "movie" promotes itself for being shocking, banned in the UK, and refused for processing by three film developing studios. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |